Dominik Koepfer vs Filip Misolic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Koepfer vs F. Misolic

GER
0
Win
Played
1
Win

AUT
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Koepfer 0 - 1 Misolic
They have played 3 sets in total, with Dominik Koepfer winning 1 and Filip Misolic winning 2. The last match between Filip Misolic and Dominik Koepfer was at the Tenerife 2 Challenger, 14-02-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 6-2 2-6 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Koepfer | 0 |
| Misolic | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Tenerife 2 Challenger(02-14-25)
D. Koepfer vs F. Misolic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,920,765 | Career Prize Money | $644,425 |
| 59.73% (313-211) | Career Total W/L | 61.99% (212-130) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.37% (9-10) |
D. Koepfer vs F. Misolic Match Preview:
Second Serve Performance Recent Form:
In recent form over the past six months, the performance of Koepfer on their second serve has yielded a remarkable success rate of 49.07% in terms of winning points. On the other hand, Misolic has exhibited a commendable performance, winning 48.36% of points on their second serve. It is worth highlighting that there exists a significant correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return Game Stats Recent Form:
Delving into the return game statistics, Koepfer has proven to be a formidable opponent in recent form. Winning 48.35% of their opponent's second serve points, the player has demonstrated their ability to capitalize on advantageous situations. Conversely, Misolic boasts a respectable record, winning 46.53% of second serve points. These figures are further emphasized when analyzing first serve returns, wherein Koepfer registers 31.14%, while Misolic exhibits a rate of 35.31%. This statistical measure serves as a valuable indicator when determining the favored player in their highly anticipated head-to-head matchup.
Under Pressure Analysis:
In terms of coping with pressure moments, Koepfer has displayed considerable resilience in saving 52.87% of breakpoints in recent form. In contrast, Misolic has proven to be even more adept, saving an impressive 61.11% of breakpoints. This particular statistic is of utmost importance when making predictions for in-game betting.
Performance Overview:
Looking at their overall performance within the past year, Koepfer has attained a 47.62% victory rate in the matches played (20 wins out of 42 total). Meanwhile, Misolic boasts a slightly higher success rate, winning 51.11% of their matches (23 wins out of 45 total). These figures contribute to generating an overarching prediction for their head-to-head encounter.
Best Surface:
When analyzing performance on different playing surfaces, it becomes evident that Koepfer achieves their most triumphant results on hard courts, boasting a 61% career win rate (141 victories out of 231 matches). However, their performance dwindles slightly on grass courts, with a success rate of 56% (24 victories out of 43 matches). In contrast, Misolic thrives on clay courts, achieving an impressive career win rate of 66% (134 victories out of 203 matches). Nevertheless, their performance on grass courts leaves much to be desired, with an unfortunate 0% win rate (0 victories out of 2 matches).
Player Level:
When assessing the players' level of competition, Koepfer has primarily engaged in matches on the main tour within the past year, securing victories in 41.18% of their contests (7 wins out of 17 matches). Conversely, Misolic has predominantly participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10,000. During these encounters, Misolic has won 46.88% of their matches (15 victories out of 32 matches). Evaluating statistics between the players in order to predict the favored contender necessitates considering the relative event level in which they have competed.
Opponent Quality Stats:
Throughout the previous 12 months, Koepfer has consistently faced opponents with an average rank of 180.26. Comparatively, Misolic has confronted opponents with an average rank of 275.84. These figures shed light on the caliber of opponents each player has encountered, further contributing to the intricacies of match prediction.
Deciding Set Performance vs All Players:
For those intrigued by the excitement of live betting, the performance of players in deciding sets proves to be a captivating aspect. Over the past year, Koepfer has emerged victorious in an impressive 67% of deciding sets. Respectably, Misolic has achieved a 60% success rate in all matches played on the professional tour. These statistics offer valuable insights for in-game wagering.
Current Event H2H Stats:
While past player performance undeniably serves as a crucial factor in predicting tennis matches, it is equally imperative to consider current event statistics for a more accurate assessment of players in top form. For specific indicators of in-form players, please refer to the section below, provided they have participated in matches within the ongoing event. Additionally, one ought to acknowledge that some players exhibit elevated performance levels in particular events, warranting careful consideration when predicting the ultimate outcome.
Break Point Conversion:
Examining recent form, Koepfer has demonstrated an impressive ability to seize opportunities, converting 38.89% of their breakpoints with remarkable efficiency. In a similar vein, Misolic has showcased their proficiency, converting 40.19% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This telling statistic proves invaluable when seeking live betting tips, particularly when either player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in models that accurately predict tennis matches, we recommend delving into this article, though it is intended for avid statisticians.
Dominik Koepfer vs Filip Misolic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Koepfer vs F. Misolic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 14 | Games Won | 15 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:26:51 | Average Match Time | 2:26:51 |
| 63% (57/91) | 1st Serve % | 68% (65/96) |
| 67% (38/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (41/65) |
| 47% (16/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (15/31) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Pts Won % | 56% (5/9) |
| 42% (40/96) | Return Points Win % | 41% (37/91) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Koepfer Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-2 2-6 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 3-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
F. Misolic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 2 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-7(3) 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 1-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 7-6(6) | ||

D. Koepfer vs F. Misolic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0/0) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.99% (212/130) |
| 0% (0/0) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.53% (462/341) |
| 0% (0/0) | Games Win/Loss | 52.57% (4033/3638) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.75% (21/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 67.87% (169/80) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.72% (19/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 910 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 797 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:34:55 |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 361.18 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 59% (13388/22883) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9091/13388) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4805/9495) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (996/2277) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 40% (9000/22295) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 60.00% (15/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 58.18% (32/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 59.74% (92/62) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 69.70% (69/30) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (205/330) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (65/104) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 68% (75/111) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (189/170) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (189/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (152/41) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025

Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

Bergamo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mark Lajal vs Justin Engel Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets
